clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

New Jersey Devils at Montreal Canadiens: Zone Exits and Passing Stats

Another goal from Steve Bernier wasn't enough. This is a look at the Devils performance against Montreal from Monday night. Overall, they controlled the shot attempts, but due to some turnovers and less than stellar zone exit stats, they gave away the points to an opportunistic Canadiens team.

Elsa
The Devils came into Montreal on the back of some strong possession games and continued their positive play against the Canadiens. Unfortunately, as John noted in his recap, this game had an all-too-familiar end to it. While the Devils controlled most of the play and out-attempted the Canadiens, they could have dominated even further had it been for some more efficient work in their own end. I’ve broken down the SAG categories to those generated in the Offensive Zone and those generated in the Neutral/Defensive Zones.

Passing Stats

Forwards:

The usual big guns were out in force tonight as Dainius Zubrus, Travis Zajac, Patrik Elias, and Jaromir Jagr accounted for 19 of the forwards 29 SAG. 3 of Elias’ were generated from the Neutral Zone, suggesting passes that led teammates into open ice. Michael Ryder had a very effective game, completing each of his 8 passes in the offensive zone. Jagr, Zubrus, and Bernier were the most wasteful, each missing at least 4 passes.

Defensemen:

The defensemen had some poor percentages in the offensive zone, but otherwise were efficient. They produced 3 more shot attempts than they’ve been averaging. Of course, you’ll notice the high totals for DZ Attempts, which we’ll cover in the zone exit section, but the Devils spent more time in their own end than they should have. Andy Greene continued to be the most effective blue liner, while Eric Gelinas and Jon Merrill look like a future top pairing.

Game_28_devils_canadiens_passing

Passing Data Explained:

Pass: A reasonable and deliberate attempt to get the puck to a teammate which maintains possession or results in a shot attempt. This excludes zone clears, dump-ins, and anything that is akin to a desperate swipe at a loose puck. If a player passes a puck into space or off the boards, it finds a teammate, and it appears it was done deliberately, that shall be a pass. When in doubt, common sense will prevail.

What you see above is a chart illustrating pass completions, pass attempts, and pass percentages for each player in all three zones. A pass that goes across a zone or two will be marked as occurring in the zone it originates from.

Each completed pass that results in a shot taken by a teammate counts as one “shot attempt generated” or “SAG” in the chart below. This is tracked to attempt to determine which teammates are better at generating opportunities to shoot.

Zone_exits_game_28_devils_canadiens

Zone Exit Stats:

Forwards:

Jaromir Jagr had 11 exit attempts, at least 5 more than any other forward, and only surpassed by 2 defensemen. He finished at 54.5 PE%, which helped the group’s totals, but not enough to keep them from slipping to 45.3 PE% for the game. Travis Zajac, Adam Henrique, and Michael Ryder all finished under 40 PE%. Damien Brunner filled in nicely for Henrique after his exit, recording all but 1 of his attempts once he was bumped up to play alongside Patrik Elias and Steve Bernier.

Defensemen:

After two straight games over 50 PE% as a group, the defensemen slipped considerably against Montreal, finishing with 41.3 PE%. Mark Fayne and Marek Zidlicky were the worst offenders. Anton Volchenkov and Eric Gelinas finished at 40 PE%. Jon Merrill and Andy Greene were the only defensemen at 50 PE% or higher. The 63 exit attempts was 10 higher than the defensemen’s season average, indicative of too much time trying to come out of their own end.

Game_28_Zone_Exits_Canadiens

Zone Exits Explained: Any attempt made by a player to advance the puck from their defensive zone. These actions fall into the below categories (as illustrated on the below chart).

Possession Exits:

(P) Pass: When a player passes the puck out of the zone and it successfully finds a teammate.

(C) Carry: When a player skates with the puck out of the zone, maintaining possession.

Successful Zone Exits without Possession:

(FP) Failed Pass: When a player passes the puck out of the zone, but it fails to find its target.

(FC) Failed Carry: When a player skates with the puck out of the zone, but loses possession shortly thereafter.

(CH) Chip: When the player lifts the puck out of the zone or throws it off the boards and out.

(X) Other: Any action that results in a successful zone exit not already covered.

Unsuccessful Zone Exit:

(PT) Pass Turnover: When a player fails to clear the zone with a pass and it results in a turnover to the opposition.

(CT) Carry Turnover: When a player fails to skate out of the zone with the puck and loses possession.

(I) Icing: An attempt to clear results in icing the puck.

(T) Turnover: Any action that results in a turnover not already covered.

What does everyone think of tracking SAG by Offensive zone and the other two zones? StatsGuy suggested it off of the 20-game passing post from yesterday. Let me know what you think!